Progress updates

This is an archive of the progress updates that go out to the lookit-research list, for reference. Links and pictures may be lost.

May 2020 [Slack announcement]

Quick update on launch timing, since we understand folks are eager to start testing!

The good news is that despite recent challenges, we’re still shooting for a launch within the next few months.

Here’s what’s left -

  • We’ve hired an outside security firm to do penetration testing & static code analysis before we open up the production server for you to run your studies. They’ll be wrapping up next week - so by the end of the month we’ll have an updated launch date. The amount of remediation we’ll need to take on is the big unknown for timing; if all goes smoothly and they don’t have any surprises to report, we’d be looking at about June 15th.
  • In parallel, there are two mid-size site-wide features we’re working on that need to happen prior to launch - one is a restructuring of permissions & setup of Labs to allow research groups to independently manage adding people (details here), another is setting up announcement emails (details here).
  • I’m still adding some frames (details here) and dealing with a handful of other changes. Please watch for an announcement by the end of the month with a more solid date!

Lastly, thank you all SO MUCH for your patience and support. This is a delightful community, and your thank-yous and understanding have meant a lot to me personally. To be honest, it’s been a bit of a hard transition to working at home with three kids - especially since it feels like I ought to be working all the time to get tools up and running for the field. Although Lookit was obviously relatively well-positioned to continue during a pandemic, it’s been a challenge to handle the surge in interest in addition to continuing with our planned development path. It’s just the two of us here, and MIT’s hiring freeze means we can’t easily change that. So if you’re eager to get started, please check out the list of ways to get more involved here.

Winter 2020

Happy St. Patrick’s Day, Lookit friends!

Hope you’re coping ok with social distancing measures. We’ve been getting a lot of inquiries about running studies given that labs have shut down in-person testing. The short answer is we’re welcoming everyone to get started, but you should understand that this isn’t an immediate solution (see updated wiki).

Here’s the news about Lookit since the summer…

  • We’re aiming to launch this spring! (Yes, earlier than previously estimated.) That means letting anyone develop and submit their own studies on lookit.mit.edu. My APS Observer article has an overview of the current status and what people can do to get started. (If you are interested in preparing a study to run on Lookit, please go ahead and start on these steps - you don’t need to ask for permission, unless you have some specific concern you want to check in about.)
  • A tutorial introduction to using Lookit is now available so that new researchers can set aside a known amount of time to work through step-by-step exercises and end up ready to put their own studies online. We have about 12 people working through it as far as I can tell. The first tutorial office hours are this afternoon! I also presented a workshop on Lookit at the “Open Developmental Science” preconference at CDS this fall (materials available at that link).
  • Undergrad student Kamaria Kaalund worked on social media outreach and better understanding our participants’ motivations during the fall term. The quick conclusion? It’s not as easy as we might hope to reach parents via Facebook or Instagram, even using creative human-generated content :) You can read her report on survey responses here.
  • We have some new flyers for Lookit available. This turns out to have been exactly the wrong time to make them, but someday when families are out and about at playgrounds, libraries, etc. we will post them locally and are happy to send physical copies to you if you want to help out!
  • Our beta testers have continued testing, and a pilot of one long-awaited study is now live: “Baby See, Baby Do?” (Laurie Bayet, American University) looks at newborns’ imitation of parents at home.

Platform development:

  • Rico’s finishing up transferring hosting over from the Center for Open Science, which will give us complete control over the CI/CD pipeline and more ability to scale up. There are a lot more moving parts than I realized. We also finished the recruitment dashboard which shows participation and registration over time, as well as allowing tabulating by various characteristics to evaluate how recruitment efforts work.
  • I’ve made substantial changes to the data download options to make it easier to analyze and share data, while minimizing the risk of unintentional disclosure of personal information. You can now download an overview with one line per response or a detailed file with data in a fairly standard ‘long’ format, both with data dictionaries / dictionary templates! You can omit potentially sensitive information like names, and even download children’s ages already rounded, to avoid storing birthdates at all. By default Lookit now provides child and account IDs specific to the study - so you don’t have to worry about the potential for de-anonymization via linking data across studies. (Changes summarized here and here)
  • We’ve clarified some terminology and substantially simplified the user interface for study editing. No more “building dependencies” (that’s now “building an experiment runner”) and no more building separate containers for the experiment vs. the preview. When selecting the version of the experiment runner to use, you can see some information about what version you’re currently using and click “check for updates” to see what new is available.
  • Study previews now work exactly like participation, so that you can see how everything works (including what your data and video downloads will look like) without having to actually start your study. And you have the option to share your study preview so that other experimenters can access it to give feedback!
  • MIT’s Quest for Intelligence “Bridge” program has been working on evaluating solutions for automated gaze coding of developmental video, using datasets from Lookit and from Virginia Marchman’s lab. The most promising starting point, OpenGaze, has proven extremely hard to get running at all; they’re still trying, but also exploring some other avenues. A visiting PhD student from Antonio Torralba’s group here at MIT will be working on using an entirely new approach (reflection of the screen on the eye), which I think will be a longer-term solution if it works out. I do still think we need a dedicated person on this project, but realistically this is on hold for now given the pandemic and general disruption to labs.
  • A bunch more technical progress has happened in the background. It’s not very exciting to tell you bugs you didn’t know existed are fixed… but they are.

Funding:

  • Lookit is part of a collaborative Simons proposal to pilot a cognitive task battery (approximate number, prosocial agent preferences, visual prediction, CDI, …) in infant sibs of kids with autism.
  • We have funding for Rico and me for at least the next 12-18 months, but are still looking for ways to hire other necessary staff (recruitment, study support, someday ideally another developer), include more students, bring in consultants as needed, etc. We’re working with MIT Open Learning on a broader fundraising strategy, but for now, if you have a project you plan to run on Lookit and you’re applying for funding, we’d be grateful to hear about it and discuss writing in some appropriate amount of support for the platform!

What’s next:

  • Before launch we have a few features to finish up, but our major priority is getting an independent review of potential security issues (risk assessment/scan, penetration testing). We’re interviewing several companies now; administrative issues regarding setting up a contract while everything’s shut down are the major unknown hat will affect launch timing.
  • One of my priorities is adding experimental components to cover typical things people want to do on Lookit. If you have an idea of the study designs you want to run, it’d be really helpful to comment here describing functionality you would ideally like.

Summer 2019

Happy Fall, Lookit friends!

Hope you’re enjoying the start of the semester. Here’s an update on what we’ve been up to in the past six months.

We’ve primarily been focused on platform development, and have a lot of progress to report since the last update:

  • The “consent manager” tool is live and in use! Researchers can view consent videos and mark them as valid/invalid. All permissions to access data now take into account the (centrally stored) consent review status; researchers can’t accidentally access or use any data before checking for a statement of informed consent. In a similar vein, in the rare cases where parents choose to withdraw all permission to use video at the end of a study, those videos are automatically made unavailable and deleted. These are some of the features we prioritized to reduce the potential for human error in data handling.
  • Families can see their own videos right away after participating, to check everything worked and what their kids were up to! And researchers can easily leave friendly feedback from the Lookit platform. This both helps make participation more rewarding for families and aligns with our ideal of respecting families as partners in discovery.
  • Families can now indicate languages their child speaks and some conditions and characteristics with checkboxes when they sign up, paving the way for research with special populations and eventually hosting studies in more languages.
  • Researchers can flexibly describe eligibility criteria for their studies using a boolean expression, referencing the child’s age, gestational age at birth, language background, and other characteristics.
  • Email functionality is much improved–it’s easier to select the appropriate participants, and emails sent via the Lookit platform are stored and downloadable by researchers.
  • Rico’s currently working on a recruitment dashboard to support evaluation of outreach efforts, showing various trends over time in how many families and kids are accessing Lookit and participating in studies, how old kids are, demographics of families, how they heard about Lookit, etc.

We’ve also been expanding functionality for the individual studies, based on needs that have come up in beta testing:

  • Study frames now allow setting parameters based on previous data from the same session and child characteristics, allowing for conditional branching, personalization of stories or instructions, continuing training until some criterion is met, etc.
  • Webcam recording can either be conducted within individual frames or session-level recordings can be made by saying which frame to start and stop recording on
  • A child assent form (which can be shown only for children of a specific age and up, if desired) supports a standard assent workflow with multiple segments of pictures and text or audio/video explanations.
  • It’s easier to substitute values throughout a study and to make groups of frames.

Our beta testers are continuing to try out and provide feedback on the platform, and the first few studies have been completed! Here’s the current status….

  • “Mind and Manners” (Erica Yoon, Mike Frank): complete and included in Erica’s CogSci paper
  • “Flurps and Zazzes” (Lisa Chalik, Yarrow Dunham): completed first study, collecting another round of data
  • “Baby Euclid” (Molly Dillon, Liz Spelke): completed first study, preparing a conceptual replication
  • “Labels and Concepts” (Bria Long, Mike Frank): completed data collection, analyzing
  • “Look and Listen” (Halie Olson, Rebecca Saxe): data collection ongoing
  • “Your Baby, the Physicist” (Junyi Chu, Liz Spelke): data collection ongoing
  • “Baby Laughter” (Caspar Addyman): data collection ongoing
  • Several more studies are under active preparation to start testing: action planning in teens with autism (Pawan Sinha, MIT); neonatal imitation at home (Laurie Bayet, AU); and approximate numerosity judgments in deaf and hearing-impaired children (Stacee Santos, BC).

Good news and bad news on funding (we’re only partway back to the drawing board).

  • Lookit will likely be included in a DARPA grant to develop AI systems that reach specific target developmental milestones (on the basis that we should know more about how human children behave if we want AI to behave like them!)
  • Our application to the Spencer Foundation was rejected, as were several collaborative proposals we were part of (e.g. NSF mid-scale infrastructure for online research, Caplan Foundation for the neonatal imitation study).
  • We would be happy to hear about ideas for collaborative proposals from folks who would like to run a particular project on Lookit, even ahead of the official launch.

Legal and logistical news: Research on Lookit is now approved via researchers’ own IRBs, after they sign an institutional access agreement. Six institutions have approved the agreement so far, and we haven’t run into any major issues besides delays at MIT. To ensure we’re all on the same page about the agreement, there’s now an informal quiz about the Terms of Use to submit along with the signed agreement. (Feel free to try it out - feedback is welcome!)

MIT’s Quest for Intelligence “Bridge” program is evaluating OpenGaze as a starting point for automated gaze coding of developmental video, using datasets from Lookit and from Virginia Marchman’s lab. This has been slow to get started in part because they’re working with undergrad RAs; we’re interested in what it would take to get someone dedicated to this project.

Also I had a baby, Keoni, who joins her very proud brother and sister. (That’s where your spring update went.)

Next steps:

  • I’m working on a tutorial introduction to using Lookit, so that new researchers can set aside a known amount of time to work through step-by-step exercises and end up ready to put their own studies online.
  • I’ll be at the “Open Developmental Science” preconference at CDS to present a workshop on Lookit. Let me know if you want to meet up sometime during CDS!
  • In parallel with the next features to work on, Rico will be working on transferring hosting over from the Center for Open Science and setting up a security audit before launch.
  • We’ll have an undergrad RA working this term on a comprehensive survey of recruitment and advertising options, selecting a few avenues to explore in depth.
  • We’re on track for launching on schedule (September 2020) or possibly sooner - we’re excited to build momentum and start growing a community of users.

Learn more / get involved:

  • Information about the current status of the project, our longer-term plans, how IRB approval works, etc. is available on the “research-resources” Github repo and wiki.
  • Overall documentation for using platform, specific experiment frame docs
  • Development planning is organized on Github Issues on the various Lookit-related repositories. Check out what’s planned when under “milestones,” add your own feature requests, or pick something to work on!

Winter 2019

Happy almost spring, Lookit friends! Here’s an update for winter 2019.

The news:

  • Platform development is going well. You may have seen improvements to the “study edit” view if you’ve been using Lookit or staging-Lookit, including that you can now see your updated preview instantly upon changing your JSON, without having to “re-build” your study. We’ve been focusing recently on setting up permissions and workflows to enforce correct usage of data. We’re in the process of rolling out a “consent manager” tool in the experimenter interface that lets you see all the consent videos and record whether each one shows a parent making a consent statement. Only once you “accept” a consent video can you see and download the associated data and remaining video. This is something that anyone collecting data on Lookit had to do anyway, but it was up to the individual lab to figure out a process for checking consent before accessing and using data. The consent manager eliminates that duplicated work and also reduces the possibility of human error as the platform scales. (Here’s what it looks like. That’s Lookit developer Rico; he looks happier in real life, I promise.)

    Screen Shot 2019-03-18 at 4.23.07 PM.png
    
  • Adding functionality for the actual studies is also chugging along! I’ve been expanding methods for randomization and improving & generalizing individual frames. (E.g., below is a video configuration frame where you can specify text/images and whether the parent should be forced to “check off” each instruction and/or to make an example video so they can check their setup.) A lot of this work is invisible but should substantially speed up future development and/or make it easier for other people to contribute - e.g., updating dependencies and merging the ember-lookit-frameplayer and exp-addons repos into a single application.

    ExpVideoConfigQuality.png
    
  • Active studies: Testing is ongoing for Flurps and Zazzes (Lisa Chalik/Yarrow Dunham) and Your Baby, the Physicist (now run by Junyi Chu & Liz Spelke, as Melissa Kline has moved to the Center for Open Science!), although they’re down for the moment while the MIT IRB reviews our renewal.

  • Funding - we’ve submitted an invited proposal to the Spencer Foundation that would cover several studies and a share of platform development, and have a few other irons in the fire. (Rough state of affairs: if we were to get all the funding we’ve applied for, we’d actually be set to carry out our plans. But ideas are still very welcome!)

  • Legal - we’re about to start (in the next week, fingers crossed!) the first three studies conducted under non-MIT IRBs, using the Lookit access agreement! Institutions include Goldsmiths, London which needed an additional data sharing agreement signed because of GDPR.

  • MIT’s Quest for Intelligence “Bridge” program is providing some engineer time on automated gaze coding, first evaluating how starting points from both Antonio Torralba’s and Andreas Bulling’s groups do on video of babies. We have a small dataset and proposed standard posted for groups who want to share video data towards this effort, and as a first trial, a lot of data generously provided by Virginia Marchman to use for training.

  • On a personal note, I’m expecting a baby next month and will be out for a bit! I’ll follow up within the next few weeks with a leave plan for those of you directly affected.

Where to see current plans and progress:

  • Overall documentation for using platform, specific experiment frame docs (now with example screenshots!)
  • Information about the current status of the project, our longer-term plans, how IRB approval works, etc. is available on the “research-resources” Github repo and wiki.
  • Development planning is organized on Github Issues on the various Lookit-related repositories. You can add your own feature requests! Internal plans about what issues are being addressed when, and how long that will take, are organized in CodeTree - we’re happy to add you to the project if you’re curious.

Thanks for all your support and patience!

Kim

Fall 2018

Happy holidays, Lookit friends! Here’s an update for fall 2018, just under the wire.

The news:

  • Our new full-time developer, Rico Rodriguez, joined the project last month! (I can now write “we” and “team” with a clear conscience.) He’s gotten started by making the study build process (dramatically) more efficient, and adjusting the UI to allow researchers to see their changes instantly.
  • Development planning has migrated over to Github Issues on the various Lookit-related repositories. You can add your own feature requests if you want! Internal plans about what issues are being addressed when, and how long that will take, are organized in CodeTree - we’re happy to add you to the project if you’re curious.
  • Information about the current status of the project, our longer-term plans, how IRB approval works, etc. has migrated to a “research-resources” Github repo and wiki.
  • Surprising no one, recruitment is a lot easier if you pay the participants :)
  • Alpha testing studies: Testing for Mind and Manners (Mike Frank/Erica Yoon) is complete! Testing is ongoing for Flurps and Zazzes (Lisa Chalik/Yarrow Dunham) and Your Baby, the Physicist (Melissa Kline/Liz Spelke). Tell your friends with 6-7 year olds and babies! :) There are several studies in the works to support gradual recruitment efforts - see the list here.
  • The WebRTC-based webcam recording approach deployed this summer is working much more reliably. I’ve also started generalizing and improving the individual “frames” that researchers use to build their experiments. (For instance, participants now have a button to download a PDF of their consent form. Thrilling stuff, I know!)
  • Setting up a collaboration to make automated gaze coding a reality is coming along! MIT’s Quest for Intelligence “Bridge” program may (tentatively!) be able to provide support, and we have promising starting points from both Antonio Torralba’s and Andreas Bulling’s groups (example of OpenFace detecting partially-occluded child’s face). We have a small dataset and proposed standard posted for groups who want to share video data towards this effort, and as a first trial, a lot of data generously provided by Virginia Marchman to use for training.
  • Funding - our NSF grant has started, and we have several other irons in the fire. We’re still looking to raise a total of about $1.0M to get through 2021 without depending on any income from a fee structure, so additional leads or ideas for collaborations are always welcome.
  • Legal: a few other schools have actually signed the Lookit access agreement and approved IRB protocols involving data collection on Lookit! We are trying this process out already with collaborators in the UK and Canada, and things are going relatively smoothly. One ongoing challenge is GDPR: we can’t officially guarantee that participants aren’t in the EU. This isn’t a big deal for MIT - we just comply with GDPR, which is pretty sensible anyway! - but it may mean that some schools want an additional contract.
  • The documentation remains up-to-date. Wait, does that belong here? Is that exciting news? BUT OF COURSE. (Just leaving this one from last time.) The overall docs are now in their own Github repo to make it easier for folks to contribute if they want. Overall documentation for using platform, specific experiment frame docs.

What’s next: mostly hunkering down and coding.

  • Rico’s working on making the platform more usable and powerful for both researchers and participants, to get ready for proper “launch” in about 18 months.
  • I’m working on making it possible for researchers to implement their studies independently, by expanding the set of experiment frames & their functionality.
  • If you’re interested in getting yourself or your students (more) involved, take a look at the list of ways to help here.

Thanks for all your support and patience!

Kim

Summer 2018

Hi folks,

Having skipped the spring update, there is now lots of exciting news to share about Lookit.

The news:

  • We’re deploying a new WebRTC-based solution for webcam recording - no more Flash - today! This should make the participant experience much smoother, in turn making recruitment easier.
  • Our NSF grant was recommended for funding and should start in September! Thanks to a few other solid leads, we’re funded through mid-2020 and will at least be able to launch the platform. (We’re still looking to raise about another $1.1M total so we’re not initially dependent on a fee structure, so additional leads or ideas for collaborations are always welcome.)
  • MIT’s Office of General Counsel has approved our privacy policy and terms of use for Lookit. From now on, researchers using Lookit will sign an institutional agreement governing acceptable use of the platform, and apply only to their own IRBs for approval of their studies. (MIT decided that our own access to the data to run the platform does not constitute research, so there’s no protocol needed here!)
  • We finally got official permission (…forgiveness) from MIT’s tech licensing office to keep all our code open-source. (They eventually decided they didn’t need to review all >100 hand-entered dependencies that we don’t redistribute.)
  • Our alpha testers are trying out compensating participants with gift cards, to see how that changes recruitment! (Eventually, we plan to have a more centralized system for compensation, where participants earn points they can pool across kids and studies and then exchange for gift cards, donations to charity, or gear.)
  • Speaking of the alpha testers, testing for Molly Dillon’s study Baby Euclid is (tentatively) complete. We still have three studies up and running - Flurps and Zazzes (Yarrow Dunham/Lisa Chalik), Mind and Manners (Mike Frank/Erica Yoon), & Your Baby, the Physicist. I’m excited to have Melissa Kline & Liz Spelke taking over the physics study (dense longitudinal sampling of infant preferential looking) while I focus more on the platform itself. We already have 12 participants who’ve completed at least 10 sessions!
  • The documentation remains up-to-date. Wait, does that belong here? Is that exciting news? BUT OF COURSE.
  • Our undergrad Rianna got us started trying out social media outreach - we now have Instagram and more active Facebook pages. (FYI, though, directly recruiting 7-month-olds on Instagram did not work even though it sounded kind of brilliant.)

What’s next:

  • I’m working on hiring a full-time developer to get started on all the functionality we’ve planned to complete before launch. In the meantime (i.e., while MIT deliberates on whether it’s really appropriate for me to pay a developer more than a postdoc…) I’m chipping away at it myself.
  • The administrivia continues. One exciting current challenge: navigating a path to accepting payment for services and then not paying 59% overhead on it.
  • The best place to find up-to-date links to all the planning docs is still here. In particular we now have a 3-year plan!
  • If you’re interested in getting yourself or your students (more) involved, take a look at the list of ways to help here. If you haven’t already, you can fill out a survey to let us know what you want to do with Lookit. (Thanks to everyone who’s responded!)
  • Let me know if you want to be a guinea pig and get the ball rolling at your own institution on getting the access agreement signed. Then you’ll be ready to use Lookit, and I’ll have some advance warning on snags in the process.

Thanks for all your support and patience!

Kim

Winter 2018

Hi folks,

Happy 2018! Here’s an update on what the Lookit project has been up to recently.

  • We* finished a transition this fall to a new version of the Lookit site that allows multiple experimenters to create, edit, post, and access data from their own studies. Our beta testers are using this site to prepare and/or test for their own studies.
  • An IRB protocol to cover running the platform for use by outside labs is under review at MIT. Researchers using Lookit will apply to their own institutions’ IRBs for approval for their studies, and will probably sign an institutional agreement about the details of acceptable data collection and dissemination, similar to Databrary’s.
  • We’ll have at least one undergraduate for the spring term focusing on family recruitment, to start building a userbase and exploring options for publicity. We also have a volunteer developer, Rico, supporting some exploration of tech choices, and a volunteer from Scott Johnson’s lab, Bryan, helping with feature development!
  • We’ve wrapped up our subcontract with the Center for Open Science, and will shortly be transferring the github repos for Lookit code over to a Lookit org account. Although they won’t be continuing to work on this project, they are providing hosting and support until we can set up a contract with another firm for continued development.
  • We submitted an NSF grant (Developmental Sciences) last week that would fund some of the initial software development needed. I’d also like to submit a larger proposal to the new “Cyberinfrastructure for Sustained Scientific Innovation (CSSI) - Data and Software: Elements and Frameworks” program, due in April. Still no concrete news on other funding possibilities. I’ll be giving a talk in a few weeks to Resource Development here at MIT.
  • The best place to find up-to-date overall plans/schedules is still here. Linked there you can also see and comment on ideas for recruitment, software development tasks, etc.
  • If you’re interested in getting yourself or your students (more) involved, take a look at the list of ways to help here. The primary challenge we’re facing right now is finding funding, but there are a lot of ways to contribute even if you hate grant-writing.

Next steps for me:

  • Quickly implementing several “mostly for fun” studies so that there’s content on Lookit for kids from birth through 7 years old, to support recruitment efforts.
  • Continuing to work on setup - fundraising, IRB approval, tech licensing agreement, how to accept payment through MIT, recruitment, etc.
  • Designing and documenting experimental frames to cover typical developmental protocols.

Thanks all for your support and interest - looking forward to scaling up and getting to work with more of you!

Kim

  • Don’t get too excited - this is the mathematical “we,” i.e. the opposite of the royal “we,” throughout.

Fall 2017

Hi folks,

Just writing with a quick update about the Lookit platform! Here’s where we are:

  • I graduated! I’m now working on Lookit as a research scientist, still at MIT.
  • In the next few weeks, we’re finishing up a transition to a new version of the site that allows multiple experimenters to create and post studies on Lookit–with permissions to edit, manage, and view data only from their own studies. Hooray!
  • We still have some work to do on logistics, software development, and (readiness for) recruitment before making the tool open to the community, but that’s still the goal.
  • We’re in the process of figuring out how to fund the project going forward. (Right now it’s just me, and just until July.) Ideas are welcome!

If you want all the gory details, please see this document which lays out a vision for the platform, current status, what we’d need to actually launch, my schedule, etc. (Note that this proposes creating a board that would handle fundraising, but we’re actually first waiting to hear back about some potential funding that might make a formal board unnecessary at this point.)

Soon I’ll be looking to choose a few studies to keep on Lookit to support recruitment - so that there’s something “there” for infants through 7yos when we get them to the site. The hope is for these studies to be (a) fun and interesting for families (primary criterion) - ideally we want something super-cute that kids love, and parents learn from and want to tell their friends about. Interactive with the parent is great. (b) easy to implement (both programming-wise, and for parents - i.e., they don’t have to have a set of 10 identical red blocks and a whisk) (c) interesting enough scientifically that a lab will analyze and publish the data. (Does not need to be groundbreaking science, “interesting to parents” is the better criterion.)

If you have an idea that would be JUST SO CUTE but you have to keep reminding yourself that you’re not totally sure what we’d learn from it scientifically… this is that idea’s moment. Not-quite-experimental ideas are fine! (e.g., “demonstrate something that reliably makes your baby laugh!”, “have your 3yo tell a joke,” “record 5min of your toddler’s private speech,” etc.) Take advantage of being at home and in diverse can make use of comparisons like right before vs. right after naptime… whether kids are bilingual… in a living room vs. office vs. kitchen… you can look at sibling interaction in the home… you can study newborns(!) as long as you don’t need an especially controlled environment…

Send any proposals in the next month or so, and we’ll select a few to start working on in December!

best, Kim